THE STATUS OF ARGUMENTS IN ABSTRACT ARGUMENTATION FRAMEWORKS. A TABLEAUX METHOD
نویسندگان
چکیده
Dung’s argumentation frameworks are formalisms widely used to model interaction among arguments. Although their study has been profusely developed in the field of Artificial Intelligence, it is not common see its treatment those less connected computer science within logical-philosophical community. In this paper we propose bring that audience a proof-theory for argument justification based on tableaux, very similar Logic students familiar with. The tableaux enable calculate whether an or subset arguments accepted rejected accordance preferred and grounded extension-based semantics. Soundness completeness results regarding semantics provided.
منابع مشابه
Assessing Arguments in the Abstract: Some Problems with Argumentation Frameworks
Argumentation frameworks are logic systems that assess collections of conflicting arguments generated from a set of potentially inconsistent factual and rule-based premises. Argumentationframeworks weredevelopedinresponsetocriticisms that traditional formal logic did not do justice to the adversarial nature of legal reasoning, and that it ignored the problems caused by the ambiguity of language...
متن کاملCoalitions of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks
Bipolar argumentation frameworks enable to represent two kinds of interaction between arguments: support and conflict. In this paper, we turn a bipolar argumentation framework into a “meta-argumentation” framework where conflicts occur between sets of arguments, characterized as coalitions of supporting arguments. So, Dung’s well-known semantics can be used on this metaargumentation framework i...
متن کاملAbstract Argumentation Scheme Frameworks
Argumentation Scheme Frameworks Katie Atkinson and Trevor Bench-Capon Department of Computer Science University of Liverpool Liverpool L69 3BX UK {K.M.Atkinson,tbc}@liverpool.ac.uk Abstract. This paper presents an approach to modelling and reasoning about arguments that exploits and combines two of the most popular mechanisms used within computational modelling of argumentation: argumentation s...
متن کاملRevisiting Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
This paper argues that many extensions of Dung’s framework incorporating relations additional to binary attacks, are best viewed as abstractions of human rather than computational models of reasoning and debate. The paper then discusses how these additional relations may be reified into object level knowledge, thus enabling reconstruction of the extended framework as a Dung framework, and provi...
متن کاملMerging of Abstract Argumentation Frameworks
Formalizing dynamics of argumentation has received increasing attention over the last years. While AGMlike representation results for revision of argumentation frameworks (AFs) are now available, similar results for the problem of merging are still missing. In this paper, we close this gap and adapt model-based propositional belief merging to define extension-based merging operators for AFs. We...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Manuscrito
سال: 2023
ISSN: ['2317-630X', '0100-6045']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0100-6045.2023.v46n2.ge